Photos and Updates from Mike Pittman Photography
category: regular
tags: , , ,

Mike Pittman Photography - New Site

In my last blog post I mentioned that there were some things I’ve been working on that have kept me quite busy over the past few weeks.  The largest of those projects, aside from working through photo shoots, has been updating my online presence and bringing PittmanPhoto.com in line with my vision for Mike Pittman Photography as a business.  A large portion of this change has been moving the online services I’ve setup over the years at LFC Hosting to the new hosting service, PortfolioSitez.com / PortfolioSitez on Facebook.  PSitez specializes in hosting for folks who have a portfolio to show (the name may have been a hint to that!) and their service is tailored-made for folks like me.  While the move was rough at times, I’m finally settled in to the point where I can throw my “site-warming” party.

Not only does Mike Pittman Photography have a fancy new home on the web, but I’ve also picked up some nice accoutrements to boot.  Now you can visit PittmanPhoto.com from your iPhone or iPod Touch, Android phone, or other smartphone as well as from  your iPad.  If you’re on one of those devices now, or use one regularly, head on over and check out the mobile sites.  I would love to hear your feedback, especially since I don’t have an iPad of my very own (really.  I don’t know how I’ve lasted this long without buying one) that I can visit the site with.

Take a look around at the all-new PittmanPhoto.com, and do let me know what you think about the new site.

categories: regular, review
tags:

Eye-Fi Main PageThe Eye-Fi card is a product I’ve been keeping an eye on for quite some time.  When the product was first introduced in 2005, to me it wasn’t quite ready for prime-time.  Eye-Fi has since released the “Pro” version of the card.  On a whim last “Cyber Monday” I sent Amazon about one hundred of my closely guarded dollars.

read more »

category: regular
tags: , , ,

Quite often before a shoot, or after a shoot, I’ve had the question quickly glide across my tiny little brain: “I bring all this sh*t, do I really need it all?” read more »

category: regular
tags: ,

Matt & Lisa obviously had a helluva time at their wedding, as did all of the guests.  We couldn’t have asked for a better day for shooting.  Highs during the day were in the mid 70s, and by the time the sun dropped below the horizon, the temperatures dropped as well and the fires were lit on the beach.

read more »

category: regular
tags: ,

To me, it feels like the last time I shot a wedding, Bill Clinton was the President; and I don’t like that feeling.  For various reasons, I stopped signing new clients for wedding photography in the Spring – Early Summer of 2008.  I knew I was leaving Spokane, WA but at the time I didn’t know if it would be that fall, the following winter (‘09) or spring.  As it turns out, I left Spokane in late April of this year (‘09) and set to work immediately on trying to drum up the Pittman Photography name and brand once again.

This is the 2nd time I’ve packed my gear (and my life) and moved across the country.  In both cases the most compelling reason I had to stay put was my business; and in both cases that reason wasn’t nearly strong enough to stay put.  Move number one took me from Raleigh, NC to Spokane, WA (January of ‘07); move number two took me from Spokane, WA to New Haven, CT (April of ‘09).  In both cases, I left behind a growing name and client base.

As I prepare for my first wedding since MySpace was cool I’m so excited with anticipation, it’s almost all I think about. Matt and Lisa have been absolutely fantastic to work with.  This is my chance to get back on the horse and ride.  My chance to prove to the world, Matty and Lisa, and most importantly myself that I’m not just another button pusher.

One way or another, Lisa & Matt will head off to their honeymoon on Sunday morning as a married couple.  I’ll drive back to New Haven with my first Connecticut wedding under my belt.  What remains to be seen is everything else.

Time will tell, but I think I’ve still got it.

category: regular
tags: ,

… it pours.

Just ask Annie Liebovitz. Arguably one of the most recognized photographers of our time, a non-name Paolo Pizzetti decided Liebovitz’ wounds deserved some seasoning. Salt, to be precise.

As the BBC reports, Pizzetti (mmm… pizza) is suing Liebovitz for an unauthorized use of photographs at a total of ~$300,000 USD. Thanks to Al Gore’s internet (or if you’re Bush 43 the “internets”), unauthorized use of a photo is an all too frequent occurrence. I’ve had it happen (it was quite flattering, but at the same time quite irritating) as have countless other photographers who have put their works online.

What’s new here is that Pizzetti was hired by Liebovitz to take photos of a location. Liebovitz then, Pizzetti alleges, used some of the scouting photos to create composite images without his permission. If that’s true, I’m hurt.

I would like to think that some lowly staffer screwed up, but I just can’t imagine that Liebovitz lets anything out of her studio without approving it. What will be interesting, if this goes to court, is to see how this shakes out. Could we find out that the contract Pizzetti signed gave Liebovitz usage rights?  Maybe the courts will side with Liebovitz and say since Pizzetti was hired to shoot the photos for Liebovitz, she can use them how she pleases (shudder).

Whatever happens, no matter how you look at the issues, Liebovitz work on the original photos totally kicked the originals (Pizzetti’s) ass!

category: regular
tags: ,

As a photographer, I always try to look around in my viewfinder for anything that might ruin, or make, a picture. You want to make sure there aren’t distracting highlights, poles sticking out of your subject’s head, and other such things.

I saw this photo on a new favorite blog, AwkwardFamilyPhotos.com and couldn’t find the problem. The photo is sharp, the couple is well lit, the background is colorful… but perhaps a bit too colorful.

Today, I’m going to add “nookie time” to the things I look for before pushing the shutter button.

Pin The Tail...

(Photo from AwkwardFamilyPhotos.com)

category: regular
tags: ,

Dear (Insert Name of Friend Here),

It seems like it has been so long since we have seen each other. I’m really sorry about that. I know you’ve been wanting to see me for a while, and who wouldn’t want to see me? The trouble is, as I’m sure you will understand, every time we do something together, you insist on taking photos of me; and who wouldn’t want to take photos of me? Sure, sometimes you’re in there too, but it’s only my appearance I’m concerned about.

As my life has gone on, gravity has increased the size of my double chin (no, it’s gravity, I don’t gain weight!), my ears have gone all funny looking, and my hairline is receding. I don’t like knowing that the only person in charge of how I look is, quite frankly, you.

That is why, effective immediately, the only camera you will be allowed to use when taking photos of me will be the Samsung DualView TL225 or TL220. Since it has that lovely little LCD on the front of it, we will both be able to see how I look when you are taking my photo, and I will know when I have reduced my chin, shown my best ear, and moved into a position where the glare from my slightly balding head no longer causes sun flare in the photo.

I understand that requiring you to purchase this new camera in order to see me is a tall request.  However, I must do this in order to keep up appearances. If the financial burden on you is too difficult to overcome, please let me know and I will do all I can to remove you from my life permanently, as clearly your income bracket and mine are too far apart anyway.

Remember, I love you… but you love me more!

—Me

category: regular
tags: ,

One of my mentors in the photo industry once told me, “Always treat your customers right. In the end, all you’re selling is customer service.”  He would go on to explain that there are photographers lined up to do what we do: shoot pictures. His point was that the marketplace was crowded, and in the end if you take care of your customers, they’ll come back. The photos most likely won’t bring back a client, but how you treat them will; or it will cause them to not come back.

Anyone who will listen has heard time and again as I lament the service I received from James Camera in New Haven. Never again will I darken their door, no matter how inconvenient it is. They are, in fact, one block away, but never will they see my face again. A little over a week ago, on a Friday, I packed up four rolls of film into a small Flat Rate USPS Priority mailer and sent it off to North Coast Photographic Service in California (Kaaahlifohnya if you’re Ahnald) after reading about their service from Ken Rockwell. The following Tuesday I received a call from NCPS telling me they had my film, it was processed and ready to go, but they wanted to make sure that I didn’t want anything else done: no scanning, no prints, no CD of proofs, etc. Two days later, on Thursday, the film was back in my hands. Total cost, including S&H both ways: under $30. Had I walked to James Camera, that cost would have been $45, and the service would have sucked. NCPS:  You get it.

You know who else gets it?  Doug Fisher over at Better Film Scanning. If you have an Epson film scanner, you know they’re not the best at designing their film holders.  Then again, neither is Microtek. My favorite film holders were the old style ones where the film slid into a channel.  Now they’re spring loaded, clip-in jobbies that don’t do any better now than they did when they were simple to use.  Doug has designed film holders that are simple to use, effective, and more importantly priced right. I emailed him a few weeks ago asking some questions about the application I had in mind, and had a reply that night, at 2:45am. No joke. His reply was, more or less, “What you want to do isn’t normal, some others have done it, but if you screw it up, dont’ come crying to me!” I appreciated his honesty, and two days later I’d placed my order. Again, late night, an email came to me explaining that a key part had just run out, and that wasn’t expected back in stock for two days. Two days, that’s all the delay Doug was expecting, and he told me about it.  Most people would’ve let it go and I’d have just waited.  The following week my new film holder showed up, packaged remarkably well, and exactly as Doug described it. The results? Astounding.  Doug Fisher, you get it.

That’s a long way to say that two people I’ve worked with recently have impressed me.  A lot of people go out of the way to say someone has made them mad, so I thought it was time to let my loyal followers (erm.. follower?) know about these two fine companies.

category: regular
tags:

NY Magazine ran a great column (http://snurl.com/ri9u1) titled “How Could This Happen to Annie Liebovitz?”  Anyone in the photo world, and most people not in the photo world, know of Liebovitz.  Even if it’s only as far as the Demi More cover of Vanity Fair, or Whoopi Goldberg taking a milk bath, we know of her.

Additionally, any photographer out there knows that no matter how good you are as a photographer, you’re not going to pull in the gaboodles of money that professional athletes or entertainers who are at the top of their game pull in. Not routinely, anyway.

This column truly brings to life exactly how it is that someone who is wealthy, but not ludicrously wealthy, can blow through money like we commoners blow through… well, money.

When I think of Liebovitz, I think of a photographer who has redefined photography, for better or worse. I think of a photographer who rightfully commands attention and whatever day rate she is being paid. I think of a photographer who, when she speaks, people listen.  Unfortunately, it appears, Liebovitz thinks herself as all of these, but on a grand scale that, when all is said and done, could cause her to be defined not by her amazing abilities but more by how she lost the on thing that any phogographer values above all else: her reproduction rights.